<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Introduces Aperture 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.offwingphoto.com/2008/02/apple-introduces-aperture-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.offwingphoto.com/2008/02/apple-introduces-aperture-20/</link>
	<description>Photography of Professional And Amateur Sports With Helpful Sports Photography Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:25:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Blunck</title>
		<link>http://www.offwingphoto.com/2008/02/apple-introduces-aperture-20/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Blunck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s273765113.onlinehome.us/?p=41#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I use Aperture 1.5 for my post-processing.  I run it on a MBP Core2 Duo 2.16GHz with 3GB of RAM and a 120GB HDD.  It runs like a dog.  It&#039;s ridiculously slow.
I&#039;m interested in evaluating the 2.0 but I noticed that they warn you that an upgrade is irreversible unless you first make a backup of your photos.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Aperture 1.5 for my post-processing.  I run it on a MBP Core2 Duo 2.16GHz with 3GB of RAM and a 120GB HDD.  It runs like a dog.  It&#8217;s ridiculously slow.<br />
I&#8217;m interested in evaluating the 2.0 but I noticed that they warn you that an upgrade is irreversible unless you first make a backup of your photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
